While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are various powders, you can find that in many cases, the place one of these is shown one other will probably be as well. Also, you will discover there is a fairly constant relationship concerning them with reference to outlined loads.
H4831 will work within the Swift but not actual effectively. You can expect to never ever receive the pressures you require for regularity Along with the .223. 760, or H414 are going to be improved but for many rationale I ain't the most significant lover of most ball powders.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo makes .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this exact same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr tablets, so It can be great to own one powder for equally.
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, locate a starting load when only one is stated for a specific cartridge.
Anyway, I knew the two pounds of H4831SC used a similar data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was anything different in between a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and 1 not so labeled. A contact to Hodgdon verified that they were in fact equivalent and the one variation was the logo on the label.
Apache Jct Superior information, I've jars of each and generally wondered if they may be reloaded Together with the same recipes need to I operate out of 1 or another.
Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the sole real change is that the shortcut meters improved by reloading tools. Once It can be loaded theres no purposeful big difference. I have listened to which the shortcut might have a little bit more rapidly burn fee but It appears insignificant.
Like reported higher than, similar things. All that is different is the scale with the kernels. I did hear somewhere that they are going to only make the SC in the future. I don't know if that is definitely real or not but would make sense to me. I use SC h4831 vs h4831sc for the reason that that is definitely what I present in the 8 lb jug and it works.
At the moment making use of IMR 4831 inside of a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a popular option for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Aside from it becoming brief cut, exactly what is the real difference in these two powders, and may I change to H4831sc?
It's humorous how over time loading h4831sc a great number of distinctive cartridges in a number of rifles which i have never obtained appropriate stop success with H-4831 or even the small-Reduce Model.
I essential a little extra myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to generally be lined for quite a while (and also have loads of precisely the same large amount of powder).
I use 52 grs H4831sc that has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It is correct, delicate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely was me, I would commence at 52 gr and get the job done up.
I usually usually get the sc Variation. Utilizing a powder measure it hangs up less due to shorter kernels and I think lets far more steady metering so much less time you are taking trickling in the last bit of cost to produce excess weight. So basically the SC will save you occasions
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Just after months, I acquired Blessed h4831sc load data and caught some H1000 on the web and of course compensated just a little excess. The quite subsequent 7 days in a gun demonstrate a man had a complete case of H1000 for $forty for each 1lb. I ignore the amount of, but with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.